As the story begins to wrap up, the amount of symbolism and emotions within the book reaches its climax. When Vladek tries to end the story with a “happily ever after,” Art refuses to give Vladek the last say in the book. Art goes on to give us more sadness and misfortune. On the final page, Vladek says “I’m tired of talking Richieu and it’s enough stories for now…” Art shows us how much Vladek truly wished for his “perfect” dead son to come back and replace Art. Art could never live up to his father’s perfect image of his dead younger brother Richieu. Below this, and Vladek’s gravestone are two years—1978-1991. These two years symbolize the years Art felt alive when writing Maus. He was able to understand his own generational trauma and work on something he truly loved; he was representing the unrepresented and giving a voice to the voiceless. However Art and Vladek’s relationship never feels resolved and seems to end with some tension as more of Vladek is revealed through the end of the story. This tension is first created at the end of Maus i when Vladek reveals he destroyed Anja’s diary. Although all the tensions set up by the book aren’t resolved in the ending, the story leaves us with many thought-provoking questions. Did Art live up to Richieu in his father’s eyes? Has Vladek finally accepted Art? The story’s riveting ending leaves us all thinking about it hours, days, or even weeks after reading.

Comments

  1. I think the relationship between Vladek and Art is the most impactful and interesting part of the book. He was never perfect, and never thanked him in the beginning of the book, but you could also tell he was grateful. Not a love-hate relationship, but a simple acknowledgements of his faults and kindness.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The life of a schadenfreudist

Is text or images more effective in comics?

What makes a monument a monument?